If UKIP are Britain’s Protectors We’re in Trouble

Europe as a bureaucratic superstate is a deep threat to Britain, its traditions and its values. There is no doubt about this. With the threat of TTIP even the EU’s veneer of European civilized benevolence is fading. If Europe cannot even protect us from GM crops or ensure workers rights then what good is there in it at all?

Joining the EU is like going for a car ride with a kidnapper – if you don’t get out while you can you may end up loosing your liberty and much more. Once the EU superstate gets tied together with legally indivisible bonds (as is the goal) then British people who want their freedom will be dissidents who will end up with the standard choices that dissidents face (submit or face punishment – resist politically and face harassment from the system, resist by direct action and face prison, resist by force and die).

So who are our protectors against this European Superstate? They certainly aren’t the main parties. Who is standing up to protect British freedom? Who are our champions in this hour of need?

Sadly it seems that it is a bunch of xenophobes, free market capitalists and crypto-fascists lead by what Russel Brand called “a poundshop Enoch Powell” who are Britain’s champions and they seem to be a little ship manned by a motley crew. Every few months they expel some new fruitcake for calling for compulsory abortion of the disabled, for disgusting racist remarks or some other crime against public taste and decency. Sadly the ones who are expelled are not lone nut-jobs, but rather they are people who voice views shared by many others in the party.

The much abused UKIP leader Nigel Farage is indeed a fan of Enoch “Rivers of Blood” Powell, however I’m not sure who I prefer – this affable former Thatcherite with all his faults or the British mass media that mobs against him and his supporters – attacking in a war of attrition, pecking like an immense flock of birds protecting their chicks from a predator, but the main chick they are protecting is the EU and the egg from which it hatched was laid by a cuckoo (Tory Prime Minister Edward ‘sold Britain to the EEC for a boat’ Heath).

Their pecking disturbs me because I’m pretty sure that even if UKIP was not xenophobic, even if it was not thoroughly infiltrated by people with unpleasant racist views, even if UKIP was a politically mainstream party that kept its focus upon saving Britain from EU slavery – the media would still be attacking, because at the end of the day there are powerful capitalist forces behind the EU project who are (sadly) having more success than the powerful (sleeping) forces that support the liberty, freedom and independence of the British nation.

It is almost certain that UKIP cannot save Britain from the EU on its own, but it can serve to build up racist hatred and xenophobia and make life in Britain less pleasant. It has created a popular forum for angry people, those with authoritarian personality complexes, those with grudges and chips on their shoulders and this is dangerous. Britain needs another champion to save it from the decimalised, busybody, Napoleonic tyranny of the EU chimera.

snoring begins…

…..“Deep in secret labs hidden in the English countryside the great British defenders against European threats including King Arthur, Hereward the Wake, the Duke of Wellington, Horatio Nelson, Hugh Gaitskell, Michael Foot and Tony Benn are being painstakingly cloned, regrown in test tubes and retrained to establish a non-partisan group for British Independence from Europe that may one day sweep through the houses of Parliament removing all traces of pro-superstate Vichyism”….

Marie Stopes – Feminist Heroine or NAZI Psychopath?

Who was Marie Stopes? Mr and Mrs Mainstream Media Dream-Mind Answer…Marie Stopes, a heroin of the modern age, a feminist, an author, a pioneer of birth control and a doctor of science. There are statues to her, charities named after her, blue placques on the houses in which she lived and even on Manchester University in her memory. She was elected “Woman of the Millennium” in 1999. Her face is on stamps and many schoolgirls are told that she is an ideal role model.  She helped people by setting up advice centers for pregnant women. Mr and Mrs Facts and Common Sense Answer…Marie Stopes, was a very, very evil woman.

  • She was a NAZI eugenicist who disowned her son because he married a woman who wore glasses (she considered it a moral crime for people with glasses to pass on their genes).
  • She was a racist NAZI who campaigned for the compulsory sterilization of mixed race people.
  • She was an elitist NAZI who campaigned for the compulsory sterilization of “C3” people  (people who were designated as being lowly and less worthy than the rest of society).
  • She was  a murderous NAZI who wrote love letters to Hitler, even during the holocaust. She wrote him poems against Jews, Russians and Catholics.
  • Her slogan in 1921 was “Joyful and Deliberate Motherhood, A Safe Light in our Racial Darkness“.
  • In 1925 she declared that she hoped to destroy the tradition of organized Christianity (she probably had a similar attitude towards all three Abrahamic religions).
  •  In 1919 this monster wrote to the National Birth Rate Commission calling for enforced sterilization of the diseased, the drunk and those of bad character (who decides who is of bad character? who decides which people are to be classed as diseased? did she not know that many wonderful people have been the offspring of drunks?).
  • She wanted to “ensure the sterility of the hopelessly rotten and racially diseased” she wanted to achieve in the British Isles “a new and irradiated race” and  she talked scathingly of the “puny and utterly unsatisfactory” offspring of the poor.
  • She was a monster who visited NAZI Germany and attended NAZI eugenics conferences alongside people who would enact the NAZI holocaust of “undesirables” (the disabled, Jews, Gypsies etc).
  • Stopes returned home to start her own holocaust of unborn “undesirables” and would use every method to trick pregnant “undesirables” into having their babies killed. This is a process that still continues worldwide in the Marie Stopes ‘birth control advice centers’. Today the Marie Stopes organization is involved in hundreds of thousands of killings of unborn children each year. Indeed, nowadays killing unborn babies is big business.

Q. When is Religiously Aggravated Assault not Religiously Aggravated Assault?

A. When the victim is George Galloway MP.

Poor old George Galloway. He may be a fan of Karl Marx, he may have gone on creepy Big Brother and pretended to be a cat, he may sometimes say things that get him into trouble, but he did not deserve to be beaten by Neil Masterson Jewish convert and Zionist fanatic.

Shortly after threatening George Galloway via his Facebook this Zionist thug just happened to “accidentally” bump into his object of venom (do we believe that this was not premeditated?) and proceeded to beat him up whilst insinuating that he was a NAZI.

George Galloway described (in a Dail Mail article) how he stopped to allow to Moroccan admirers to take a photograph of themselves with him when he saw Masterson powering towards him “like a bat out of hell”. He described how “He laid into me and was effing and blinding [cursing] about the Holocaust. He looked like the type who works out and moved very fast. He punched me so many times I kept thinking, ‘When is this going to stop?’ “But it didn’t.”

Galloway went on to point out that “Regardless of his motives, I have no regrets about speaking out on issues like Israel and the Middle East. We live in a democracy, and as someone who has been elected as an MP on six occasions, I have a right to voice my opinions.”

This 39 year old Zionist thug, a former manager at the BBC, severely beat the 60 year old MP causing severe facial injuries, bruising and a broken rib. George Galloway was treated at St.Mary’s Hospital in Paddington before being released to limp home.

Masterson also assaulted a good Samaritan who tried to protect the Member of Parliament from this brutal attack.  Neil Masterson (who deserves the epithet of Zionist terrorist) admitted the two counts of assault that had been brought up against him at Isleworth Crown Court and he was given a 16 month jail sentence (he will probably serve only part of this).

George Galloway was left puzzled at the failure of the court system to recognize that this was indeed an obvious case of religiously aggravated assault (which would have brought a much longer sentence). He said of the verdict “I fail to see why that charge was dropped given that he was wearing an IDF (Israel Defence Force) T-shirt and screaming about Israel and me.”

The facts of the matter are Neil Masterson converts to Judaism (a religion), considers Israel to be the homeland of the Jews and physically attacks a man who criticizes Israeli excesses and the British legal establishment does not consider this assault to have been religiously motivated.

We all know with near absolute certainty that if Neil Masterson had been a similarly thuggish covert to Islam who assaulted a MP who was known as a loud vocal supporter of Zionism then it would have been considered a clear case of religiously aggravated assault and the sentence would have been far longer than 16 months.

Many people will suspect that the truth, however, is that the whole idea of heavy sentences for religiously aggravated assault was designed with one community in mind and it was never intended for the likes of Neil Masterson. Meanwhile George Galloway is a rebel against the British ruling classes (economic, political and media), rather than being shocked by this brutal attack many of them were filled with glee.

At the end of the day you can have a legal system based upon justice and fairness which deals with all people equally based upon the established laws or you can have a system that is influenced by various prejudices and which treats some cases very differently from others. I know which of these options I prefer.

Some Beautiful Quotes

Minds should be enlightened with science, and hearts need to be illumined with religion.”
 .
Said Nursi
.

“So I say to you, Ask and it will be given to you; search, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened for you.

Attributed to Jesus Christ (as)
 .

“Love sometimes wants to do us a great favor: hold us upside down and shake all the nonsense out.”

Hafiz of Shiraz

“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners do the same.”

Attributed to Jesus Christ (as)
 .
“Whoever has two tunics is to share with him who has none, and whoever has food is to do likewise.”
 .
Attributed to John the Baptist (as)
 .

“I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Attributed to Jesus Christ (as)
.
“Those who seek everything in materiality know only what their eyes see, and such eyes are blind in spiritual matters.”
.
Said Nursi
 .
“Do what you do only for God’s sake, start for God’s sake, work for God’s sake, and act within the sphere of God’s good approval.”
 .
Said Nursi
 .
“Those who attend to the good side of everything contemplate the good. Those who contemplate the good enjoy life.”
 .

Said Nursi
 .
“If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”
 .
Attributed to Jesus Christ (as)
 .
“But if anyone has the world’s goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God’s love abide in him?”
 .
1 John 3:17 purported Gospels
 .
Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have corroded, and their corrosion will be evidence against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up treasure in the last days. Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, are crying out against you, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in self-indulgence. You have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter.
 .
James 5:1-6 purported Gospels
 .
“And Jesus entered the temple and drove out all who sold and bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold pigeons. He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you make it a den of robbers.”
 .
Matthew 21:12-13 purported Gospels
 .
“Thus, when you give to the needy, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.”
 .
Matthew 6:2-4 purported Gospels

.
“It was to these books that I turned for an answer to the question: What is the meaning of there is no god but God? Again I was disappointed. The books were about Islam, not about God. They covered every subject you could possibly imagine except for the one which really mattered.”
.
Said Nursi
 .
“If knowledge lacks the insight of the heart, it is ignorance. If the laws of government are not combined with the principles of wisdom, and the bonds of force not combined with the laws of truth, they will not be fruitful among the mass of the people.”
.
Said Nursi
 .
“A person who sees the good in things has good thoughts. And he who has good thoughts receives pleasure from life.”
.
Said Nursi
 .
“What gives life to people is hope, while what kills them is despair.”
 .
Said Nursi
 

TTIP A Harmful Capitalist Conspiracy

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is a trade agreement that is being negotiated between the EU and the USA. It is claimed that it will remove trade barriers, but in truth there are very few trade barriers between Europe and the USA. In reality it is designed to increase the power of business over governments and to prevent them from taking stances in the interests of their people if they will interfere with the big corporations (who will be able to sue them thanks to the TTIP).

TTIP has obvious benefits for big business and obvious dis-benefits for everyone else. TTIP has the potential to undermine national laws related to areas of key importance such as food safety and environmental health. It also serves to empower the corporations in various potential disputes with governments.

TTIP is supposedly about ‘protecting’ investment’, reducing ‘unnecessary’ trade barriers and ‘harmonising’ regulations between the US and the EU to free up trade, but in reality is about the dis-empowerment of the representatives of the normal people (democratically elected leaders) and the empowerment of the representatives of the Capitalists (the big corporations).  Many people from across Europe have taken to the streets to demonstrate against the TTIP (whatever good that does). They have pointed out that iniquitous practices common amongst powerful businesses may be further enforced through TTIP structures, the threat of enforced of privatization of state owned services and industries (against the people’s interests) and they have warned against the secrecy and lack of transparency of TTIP.

The people of countries that may be effected by TTIP have generally been kept in the dark about this harmful development. They have not been allowed to know who set the TTIP agenda. Neither have they been informed of what exactly has been negotiated “on their behalf”. Indeed much of the available information on this subject is only available thanks to leaks and freedom of information requests. Many requests for information on this subject from the EU have been heavily censored.

A threatened TTIP EU-US Regulatory Cooperation Council would have the power to interfere with current and future EU regulations and further remove the locus of power in the EU away from the people and into the hands of technocrats. If the elected politicians of the EU states wanted one thing but it conflicted with the rules and demands of businesses that had become enshrined thanks to TTIP, then it would be tough tits for the people (unless they wanted to get sued by a pro-business kangaroo court).

If TTIP has its wicked way with the EU then the new reality will mean that any government that wants to introduce stronger food safety laws or anti GM requirements or other benevolent state interventions may be sued by the greedy corporations (who will declare that this has affected their TTIP rights to free trade). TTIP has the potential to flood Europe with GM tainted produce and make it harder for countries to resist the environmental vandalism known as fracking (may the frackers frack off). It may degrade and destroy labour rights and cause a whole host of other nasty scenarios.

The USA is not going to adopt Europe’s higher standards in food safety, pollution, data privacy and various other subjects so we can all see where this rubbish deal is leading. In fact the US  Senate Finance Committee has already taken steps to reduce EU restrictions on such puke risers as hormone laden beef, chlorinated poultry and GM tainted foodstuffs.

This is the same sort of trade agreement that big business has used to bully many third world countries who innocently sought to look after the interests of their people in ways that coincidentally limited the actions of the big corporations. This type of agreement has also been used to ensure that governments must destroy nationalized industries and to generally make the governments slaves of big business not of the populous.

TTIP would enable American companies in Europe to challenge EU governments at secretive international tribunals if the laws of the countries (laws protecting public health, well being and safety) are claimed to interfere with the companies profits. Such courts which already exist thanks to other similar agreements have awarded billions of (tax payers’) dollars to big Capitalist enterprises from governments who were simply looking after their people in reasonable ways.

Sadly the fat cats have shown themselves willing and able to attack elected governments who enact any form of legislation that does not work to the advantage of big business, goodbye public sector service provision if TTIP infects Europe like an evil New World pox..

Real people want to be protected from powerful corporations not to have their government turn their country into a free brothel (and their workers and consumers into unwilling and unawares prostitutes and wage slaves) for these amoral alien invaders.

Real people want to live in a safe, ordered environment over which they have some influence and which is run according to principles of compassion, wisdom, fairness and justice. They want and deserve a political system that protects them from the demands of mindless, greedy corporations whose only motivation is profit. TTIP is taking Europe in exactly the wrong direction.

George Monbiot Article

TTIP Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

TTIP on Labour List

TTIP A Threat to Democracy

“It is clear this government thought they could do this deal in secret, a deal that would mean the irreversible sell off of our NHS to America”.

(Gail Cartmail of Unite Union)

Labour believes that key to an EU US trade deal that we would encourage the rest of Europe to support, which avoids a race to the bottom and promotes decent jobs and growth would be safeguards and progress on labour, environmental and health and safety standards. Labour has raised concerns over the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism in TTIP. Labour believes that the right of governments to legislate for legitimate public policy objectives should be protected effectively in any dispute resolution mechanisms.”

(Labour Party, which favours TTIP with safeguards)

“The only way to stop the US-EU trade deal (euphemistically called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, TTIP) from interfering with the freedom of an incoming Labour government to reverse NHS privatisation is by demanding that the UK government vetoes TTIP unless health services are clearly and fully exempted.”

Michael Meacher MP

“It was argued  that it (TTIP) will stimulate trade by removing tariffs and thus promote jobs and economic growth.   That is nonsense since these tariffs are already at minimal levels.   Even US and EU officials admit that the real goal is to remove regulatory ‘barriers’ which restrict the potential profits to be made by transnational corporations….  

…these ‘barriers’ are in reality some of our most valuable social standards and environmental regulations such as labour rights, food safety rules (including restrictions on GMOs), regulations on the use of toxic chemicals, digital privacy laws and even banking safeguards introduced to prevent a repeat of the 2008 financial crash…

…in addition to the deregulation agenda, TTIP also seeks to open up new markets in public services and government procurement contracts to competition from the big private multinationals.   That will usher in a further wave of privatisations in the most sensitive key sectors of health and education among others….

…the really biggest issue of all is that TTIP would grant foreign investors a new right to sue sovereign governments in front of ad hoc arbitration tribunals for loss of profits from public policy decisions over health, safety, workplace standards, chemicals use, etc.   This investor-State dispute settlement mechanism effectively elevates transnational capital to a status equivalent to the nation-State itself.   That would undermine the fundamental principles of democracy in both the EU and USA.”

Michael Meacher MP

The Conflict Between Workers Rights and Free Trade

Has No one Noticed TTIP Allows Multinationals to Override Governments

Freemason’s Gave Islam a Bad Name

In the current era we hear of various problematic people who claim to represent Islam doing various problematic things supposedly in the name of Islam. These people and their antics have been a constant presence in the media ever since the American Neo-Conservatives and defense establishment started to aim their sights at them after the fall of Soviet Communism. Their most notorious incarnations include…

 

1. The Taliban an Afghan group set up against the tyranny of the warlords which adopted the socio-political views of the Wahhabis and rejected traditional south Asian Muslim ways and attitudes. Their extremely puritanical harshness, their friendship with Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda and their failure to play ball with the Western oil establishment lead to their downfall in 2001.

*

2. Al-Qaeda a shadowy international group that developed with American assistance during the Afghan struggle against Soviet Communist invasion. Its leader the son of a rich Saudi family with close ties to the Bush family, went in the popular view from Afghan war hero to terrorist zero when he started to make threats against American people (be they soldiers or civilians) in the late 1990s. The rest is history, however the murderous al-Qaeda that developed in the subsequent ‘war on terror’ could not be farther from the original network of innocent young Muslim men from many countries who went to fight against Russian Imperialism in Afghanistan. The transformation of al-Qaeda from its original goals to international terrorist network a very dodgy affair indeed.

*

3. Boko Haram a quite ridiculous and unrealistic copy of al-Qaeda, the reality of which as an organization independent of certain political interests in Nigeria has often been disputed. Boko Haram being the silliest and most unrealistic of the Wahhabi terrorist organisations around. Boko Haram leave people wondering whether to laugh or cry.

*

4. ISIS-ISIL  the bad boys of today, a murderous offshoot of al-Qaeda that is so extreme that even al-Qaeda has disowned it. Loved by Zionists with goals for a Greater Israel, this group has destroyed the highly justified Syrian Revolution against tyranny and replaced one tyranny with another just as brutal. ISIS has also taken advantage of justified Sunni revolutionary feelings in Iraq against a Shiite government that has marginalized and persecuted them to turn many Iraqi Sunnis into the cannon fodder that they need in their violent struggle. ISIS has been accused of being a creation of rogue marketers which exists simply to create hatred for the Islamic brands of ‘Islamic‘, ‘Caliphate‘, ‘Islamic State‘ and even the blessed flag of the Last Prophet.

 

All these groups are very far from being representative of real Islam – all are members of a particular set of heretical offshoots from the religion which have long been nurtured by forces outside the Muslim world. Many of them claim an association with the Najdi reformer Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab (d.1792). He criticized the excesses that were undertaken by the people of Arabia (some of these people were undoubtedly engaged in acts similar to idolatry) and he criticized many things that were not considered to be excesses by mainstream Sunni Muslims and was a result disowned by his scholarly family and the learned people who knew him, but he was not a  terrorist nor was he like a terrorist. Indeed many of the reforms that he called for were overdue. Yet those claiming inspiration from his teachings would include a nucleus who would go on to form a terrorist seed in their harshness, brutality and ignorance of the finer points of the religion. *

 

The real problem, however, began during the late 19th century and early 20th century when the major ideological attack against both the Muslims and humanity as a whole began with the birth of “Muslim” Modernism. Largely founded by the Grand Orient Freemasons Jamal Udeen Afghani (a political agitator and a master over political trouble makers and assassins (d. 1897) and Muhammad Abdu (a man give high office by the British in Egypt (d. 1905) this “Muslim” Modernism was in fact the rejection of real Islam and the invention of something else and new – something based upon 19th century political and philosophical ideas. This philosophy would be used as a club for anti-Islamic rulers in Muslims countries to attack true Muslims with and its poisons would create untold harms to those who imbibed them. The ironic name that these poisoners had chosen for themselves was the ‘Salafiyyah’. In fact the Salaf were the early generations with whom the traditional Muslims had very deep connections but the Modernists had next to none.

*

Rashid Rida (d.1935) was a heir to the Modernist philosophy (he was another figure linked to the anti-religious Freemasonry of the continental Europeans), yet he was closer to Islam than Muhammad Abdu. He wrote against the corruption and tyranny of Muslim rulers and his works were influential but the corruption and tyranny of Muslim rulers (and non-Muslim rulers of the Muslim lands) became generally much worse in the years after him than had the ones before, some of this may be attributed to trouble caused by some of the ideas that he promoted. Rida’s magazine al-Manar became influential, but as well as Islamic notions it was also full of speculations and ideas that would confuse the Muslims. Rida became enraptured by the Saudi political adventure and adopted various Wahhabi ideas. He passed his philosophy on to various thinkers who would call themselves Salafis. They would be a mixture of Muslim “Modernist” and Wahhabi in their thoughts, yet over time they would begin to deny their links to the “Salafiyyah” movement as it became widely understood amongst the Muslims that this was an attack on real Islam.

*

In one case Rida’s “Muslim” Modernist Wahhabi hybrid was joined with some Sufi and traditional Islamic ideas by the well meaning Hassan al Banna  (d. 1928 (ra) to form the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Banna was Rida’s former student. The Muslim Brotherhood sought to restore freedom to the Muslim lands along with an Islamic society, but the Islam it was seeking to restore was influenced by both Wahhabi and Modernist conceptions of Islam. Over they years various offshoots from the Muslim Brotherhood stem have included both problematic extremists to problematic Modernists. Writers associated to the Muslim Brotherhood, such a Syed Qutb, have been the inspiration for various trouble causers. Critics of the Muslim Brotherhood have suggested that its structure and activities owe more to non-Muslim and “Muslim” Modernist political philosophies than they do to real Islam (the same has been said of its south Asian counterpart Maulana Mawdudi’s Jamaati Islami).

*

In another case Rida’s magazine al-Manar became a key influence upon the largely self taught Islamic scholar Muhammad Nasiruddin Al-Albani (d.1999). Of Albanian origins, Al-Albani was a prolific reader and spent much of his time reading Hadith books (books of the narrations of the life of the Prophet (saws). Rather than learning the commonly accepted context and meanings of these narrations at the hands of many teachers, Al Albani tended to come to his own conclusions. Al Albani became a key influence upon the Salafis of the modern era. The origins of his thoughts came from both the Freemason Modernists and the Wahhabis, yet he would become a touchstone by which many “Salafis” would assess their Islamic “orthodoxy”.

*

Today we have hundreds of brands of Salafis, Qutbists, Modernists and other assorted extremists of the modernist persuasion (some are violent some are not). All of them are united by their rejection of traditional mainstream Sunnism and Sufism which they attack unceasingly in one way or another. All of them are united by their association with trouble-making of various types and all of them are offshoots from rather than representatives of authentic Islam. So can traditional Muslims be blamed when they lump all these groups together as the troublesome products of anti-religious Grand Orient Freemasons against their religion.

Mainstream Orthodox Traditional Sunni Muslims are of the Maliki, Hanafi, Shafii or Hanbalee schools of practice, the Ashari the Maturidi or the true Athari (not anthropomorphist) schools of theology and they are favourable towards genuine Sufism which is the heart of the religion of Islam (they may reject the term Sufism and prefer the term Tazkiyyah). If they follow their religion they are not revisionists, fundamentalists, terrorists or any other sort of troublesome person. Their understanding of religion positively forbids the excesses for which the offshoots from classical Islam have become known. For further information on real Islam see…

“On behalf of Sunni Ulema and Sufis of mainstream Islam, we denounce the crimes of ISIS…”

(Sheikh Muhammad al Yaqoubi)

Extremist Schools?

Worried by UKIP successes the Tories recently decided to become the acceptable face of racism in Britain. Hence they set their henchmen off to publicly (and very loudly) beat the national scapegoats and pariahs.

Thereafter we see the politically inspired (media fed) Ofsted Trojan Horse fantasy. Ever since we have seen not only anti-Muslim but also increasing anti-Abrahamic attacks by Ofsted why?

Well the matter boils down to the very broad descriptions of “extremism” that were designed to allow Ofsted to find more (“red under the bed”) Muslim “extremists” in our midst and root them out, even where there aren’t any present. Coincidentally this new fantasy extremism happens to threaten British religious Jews and Christians as well. Hence in 2014 it is now claimed that separate boys and girls play times  in Christian schools are extremism — what next? are we going to have a ban on single sex schools from these liberal fascists or maybe mandatory indoctrination in a new catechism of political correctness, secular fundamentalism and atheism? 

That whole school is tainted with extremism. However, swap watching TV or listening to the radio with praying, and you will find similar statements would have been made by a large percentage of mainstream British school pupils, especially if we go back to the 1970s and before.  Therefore whose British values are we talking about? real British values as have been held by British people for an appreciable period of time or cultural Marxist values that have been increasingly imposed upon British people as time has gone on?

Indeed it started as an issue of the persecution of the Muslims, but now it has spread to the religious Jews and Christians. Trace these developments down the line with a knowledge of history and the presence of figures such as Richard Dawkins and one possible outcome is…
*
…that after the last British Madrassa has been closed for the extremism of promoting traditional Muslim values and other banned ideas…
*
…the last Yeshivsa has been closed for promoting traditional Jewish values and other banned ideas…
*
…and the the last Sunday School closed for promoting traditional Christian social values and other banned ideas…
*
…then we will have reached that totalitarian reality that George Orwell warned us about in 1984 or  Ray Douglas Bradbury warned us about in Fahrenheit 451 and the true values of Britain will then have been completely eradicated and this island will have been lost to the utmost evil, that darkness, horror and misery to which unopposed totalitarian secular fundamentalists always sink when they have managed to burn down everything that carries light and blessings in a place.