Rupert Murdoch rides again, whacking passing Muslims with his Zimmer frame

Australian Zionist Islamophobe Rupert Murdoch has suggested that the Muslims as a whole should be held responsible for the terrorist attacks in France despite the fact that they had nothing to do with them.

Many others across the globe have pointed out that if that was true (which it isn’t) then all Australians should be held responsible for the controversial activities of Rupert Murdoch, such as the News of the World Phone Hacking Scandal.

These Kharijite terrorists kill more Muslims than they do anyone else. Are the thousands and thousands of Muslim victims of the crimes of Al-Qaeda, ISIS and Boko Haram also to be held responsible for the actions of these terrorists?

Many have pointed out that on Rupert Murdoch’s “logic” all Muslims (including the terrorists themselves) should also be hailed and praised for the brave actions of heroic Muslim employee Lassana Bathily who saved the lives of dozens of people at the Kosher Supermarket by helping them hide and all Muslims (including the terrorists themselves) should be praised for the heroism of the Muslim police officer, Ahmed Merabit, who sacrificed his life in line of duty during the magazine attack. There is of course no logic at all to such an argument.

People are individuals, Muslims included, and no man should be held accountable for the crimes of anyone else, it is especially ridiculous that people should be held responsible for other unconnected people who would happily murder them just as they would murder anyone else. 

A few years ago a Spiegel Online article titled “Al Qaeda Kills Eight Times More Muslims Than Non-Muslims” covered a study by the Combating Terrorism Center at the United States’ Military Academy at West Point which demonstrated that up to 99% of the “Muslim” terrorists victims were in fact non-Westerners and that of these the great majority were Muslim…that’s how things were then and things are no different now.

Rupert Murdoch and the other media Islamophobes know this, they ignore it because they are propagandizing against the Muslims in much the same way that the anti-Semitic anti Gypsy establishment used to propagandize against the Jews and Gypsies and where know where this sort of scapegoating can lead (death camps being one possible grand finale*).

Already it has created a situation where identifiably Muslim Western people face an ever present threat from Islamophobic bigots and thugs that limits their freedom of movement, security and a whole host of simple everyday choices in ways that people in non-minority social groups could not imagine.

Attacks on French Muslims since Charlie Hebdo…

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(* a brief survey of relevant websites and chat-rooms has demonstrated to me that there is no shortage at all of murderous people who say that they would be very happy with a complete genocidal extermination of Muslims. Death camps for Muslims may seem unthinkable today, but so did the reign of French revolutionary terror shortly before it happened and in 1900 no one in the Poland would have believed that death camps would be built in Auschwitz and five other locations only a few decades later)    ______________________________________________________________________________________________

In  a similar vein Steve Emerson (the phony terrorist, “expert” of Fox News, which a subsidiary of 21st Century Fox of which Rupert ‘Sauron’ Murdoch just happens to be the CEO) has continued his long career of trying to ratchet up Islamophobic hate. This time by telling America that Britain’s second largest city, Birmingham, is “completely Muslim” and saying that there are “no go areas” for non-Muslims all over the place…

“In Britain, it’s not just no-go zones, there are actual cities like Birmingham that are totally Muslim where non-Muslims just simply don’t go in,” he said.

“Parts of London, there are actually Muslim religious police that actually beat and actually wound seriously anyone who doesn’t dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire,”

When Steve Emerson had tried to slip these, his latest, particular distortions of reality (distortion of reality to build up Islamophobia is basically his profession) he was used to the standard scenario where Western commentators can talk total nonsense about Muslims all day and get away with it. He did not consider that with this latest fabrication he would incur the wrath of the people of Birmingham and Britain as a whole for the crimes of insulting both reality and their civic pride.

Tory Prime Minister David Cameron described the moment he heard these Baron Munchhausen scale slurs as follows…

“Frankly I choked on my porridge and thought it must be April’s Fools Day. This guy (Steve Emerson) is clearly a complete idiot.”

Steve Emerson has been quick to recant his statements, but the fact remains that he has become economically rich from such distortions of reality and he usually he gets away with them, because his victims are Muslims who have generally learned to keep their heads down and their mouths shut.

Phony Terrorism Expert Makes a Fool of Himself

Fox News Bias Controversies on Wikipedia

______________________________________________________________________________________________

…and as a final note on the scurrilous publication Charlie Hebdo which had been well on its way to bankruptcy (and was only selling around half of its 60,000 copy print run) before the slaughter…  …it is now once again publishing cartoons that are purposely designed to offend, upset, irritate and infuriate Muslims – this time with hugely misplaced public good will and promises of government financial aide…

…proving for the umpteenth time that knee jerk reactions of people with low intelligence and little understanding of the religion only weaken the Muslims and benefit, empower and “justify” those who are already attacking them…

7 thoughts on “Rupert Murdoch rides again, whacking passing Muslims with his Zimmer frame

  1. Pingback: Russel Brand on Fox and Charlie Hebdo | patricknelson750

  2. The French Really Love Free Speech Don’t They!

    …so long as it is used to attack people and religions they don’t like that is…

    French people defend the right of scurrilous journalists to deliberately publish things designs to whip up Muslims into a fury, yet why was it that they went against free speech and banned a Jesus (as) based clothing advert that recreated the Last Supper? Well they ruled that it was “a gratuitous and aggressive act of intrusion on people’s innermost beliefs” (and the Charlie Hebdo Muhammad (as) cartoon were not?) has …hold on so you mean free speech doesn’t apply sometimes if you are attacking Christianity – its just for attacking Muslims is it?

    French people defend the right of scurrilous journalists to deliberately publish things designs to whip up Muslims into a fury, yet why was it that they went against free speech in 2005 when ‘Aides Haute-Garonne was convicted by a French court because of a HIV awareness leaflet showing a woman dressed as a nun with a couple of condoms. It was ruled that the leaflet insulted a group because of its religion (and the Charlie Hebdo Muhammad (as) cartoon did not?)….hold on so you mean free speech doesn’t apply sometimes if you are attacking Christianity – its just for attacking Muslims is it?

    French people defend the right of scurrilous journalists to deliberately publish things designs to whip up Muslims into a fury, yet why was it that they went against free speech in 1994 Paul Giniewski and Le Quotidien de Paris were ruled against for an article criticised the Pope and linked Catholicism to the Holocaaust. The Article was deemed an insult to a group because of its religion. (and the Charlie Hebdo Muhammad (as) cartoon was not?)…hold on so you mean free speech doesn’t apply sometimes if you are attacking Christianity – its just for attacking Muslims is it?

    French people defend the right of scurrilous journalists to deliberately publish things designs to whip up Muslims into a fury, yet why was it that they went against free speech when ‘Charlie Hebdo Magazine’ self-censored and fired their cartoonist Sinéfor for drawing a caricature of the son of President Nicholas Sarkozy? …hold on so you mean free speech doesn’t apply sometimes if you are attacking the family of the French President – its just for attacking the beloved figures of the Muslims is it?

    aaah I get it. when they say free speech they mean the right to wind up Muslims and hurt their feelings.

    Like

  3. In France people have so much free speech that if they speak freely to insult the national flag or the national anthem they can be imprisoned for six months.

    In France Muslim women are allowed so much freedom of self-expression in France that they are barred from education because they are not allowed to cover their hair.

    French people are allowed so much freedom of expression that they have a law against religious symbols in public spaces…so French people have the right to express themselves through their symbols so long as their are an atheist basically? yes…or in practice pretty much anyone but a Muslim.

    French people have so much freedom of expression that they are forbidden by law to reject the anti-Ottoman propaganda that has been built up by the Armenians concerning the historical troubles in that region in which both Turks and Armenians were killed. Basically you can use your free speech to repeat the propaganda of the anti-Turkish lobby, but if you use your free speech to deny it you will be breaking the law…likewise if you try and avail yourself of your right to free speech in France to disagree with the mainstream narrative of the holocaust you will find that you get a massive fine (as did Bruno Gollnisch)…

    …so do not say to me that the French care about free speech as some great principle – Indeed it seems clear that when they say “the right to free speech” just mean the right to say what they like (expressions of Islamophobic hate currently being in vogue).

    Like

  4. French Satirist Dieudonné M’Bala has been regularly up in court because the French system did not like his ‘free speech’, similarly the “rap artist” ‘Joestarr’ had his songs about President Sarkozy censored, whilst films have been censored, writers and musicians fined and even people who claim that drugs are good will find themselves on the wrong side of the law. Indeed after the horrific Charlie Hebdo attacks, in a celebration of “free speech in France”, 54 people were quickly arrested for using their supposed ‘free speech’ to say things that were interpreted as defending or making excuses for the attackers…France really cares about “free speech”? I think not.

    Like

  5. Pingback: Rupert Murdoch | patricknelson750

  6. Pingback: Stuff Racism | patricknelson750

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s